cgm system Search Results


guardian real time  (Dexcom Inc)
86
Dexcom Inc guardian real time
Guardian Real Time, supplied by Dexcom Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/guardian real time/product/Dexcom Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
guardian real time - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cgm  (Dexcom Inc)
86
Dexcom Inc cgm
Cgm, supplied by Dexcom Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cgm/product/Dexcom Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cgm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
dexcom g6 cgm system  (Dexcom Inc)
86
Dexcom Inc dexcom g6 cgm system
Dexcom G6 Cgm System, supplied by Dexcom Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dexcom g6 cgm system/product/Dexcom Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dexcom g6 cgm system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
glucath ia-cgm  (GluMetrics Inc)
90
GluMetrics Inc glucath ia-cgm
Glucath Ia Cgm, supplied by GluMetrics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/glucath ia-cgm/product/GluMetrics Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
glucath ia-cgm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
guideline for evaluating cgm alarms  (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute)
90
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guideline for evaluating cgm alarms
Guideline For Evaluating Cgm Alarms, supplied by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/guideline for evaluating cgm alarms/product/Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
guideline for evaluating cgm alarms - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
continuous glucose monitor (cgm) device  (Meiqi Trading Co)
90
Meiqi Trading Co continuous glucose monitor (cgm) device
(A) Flow diagram of study design and participating patients. (B) Changes of daily insulin dose. Data of the same subject at different follow‐up time points are connected by gray lines. False discovery rate (represented as q ‐value) was calculated using repeated‐measures one‐way analysis of variance corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method for multiple comparisons, n = 14. (C) Postprandial glucose excursions expressed as percentage of baseline during steamed bun meal test (SBMT). All data are represented as mean ± SEM, * q < 0.05 by mixed‐effects model for repeated measures corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method, n = 9–12. (D–H) Changes of glycemic variability (GV) indices at 1 week (T1W) calculated using continuous glucose monitor <t>(CGM)</t> data: (D) MAGE, (E) SDBG, (F) BG > 11.1 mmol/L, (G) LAGE, and (H) MBG. † p < .05 by paired t test (two‐tailed), n = 14. (I–J) Changes of GV indices at T1W, 1 month (T1M), and 3 months (T3M) calculated using self‐monitoring of blood glucose data: (I) TIR and (J) hypoglycemic episodes. $ q < 0.05 as stated in (B); # q < 0.05 by repeated‐measures Friedman test corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method, n = 14. (K) Representative CGM 24‐h glucose profiles demonstrating improved glycemic stability in two patients <t>by</t> <t>WMT.</t> Values of some GV indices were the same for different participants. Thus, both points and connecting lines overlapped with each other, exhibiting fewer than 14 points. LAGE, largest amplitude of glycemic excursions; MAGE, mean amplitude of glycemic excursion; MBG, mean blood glucose; SDBG, SD of blood glucose; TIR, time in range; WMT, washed microbiota transplantation.
Continuous Glucose Monitor (Cgm) Device, supplied by Meiqi Trading Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/continuous glucose monitor (cgm) device/product/Meiqi Trading Co
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
continuous glucose monitor (cgm) device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
kontinuierliche glukosemesssysteme cgm  (Beratung GmbH)
90
Beratung GmbH kontinuierliche glukosemesssysteme cgm
(A) Flow diagram of study design and participating patients. (B) Changes of daily insulin dose. Data of the same subject at different follow‐up time points are connected by gray lines. False discovery rate (represented as q ‐value) was calculated using repeated‐measures one‐way analysis of variance corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method for multiple comparisons, n = 14. (C) Postprandial glucose excursions expressed as percentage of baseline during steamed bun meal test (SBMT). All data are represented as mean ± SEM, * q < 0.05 by mixed‐effects model for repeated measures corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method, n = 9–12. (D–H) Changes of glycemic variability (GV) indices at 1 week (T1W) calculated using continuous glucose monitor <t>(CGM)</t> data: (D) MAGE, (E) SDBG, (F) BG > 11.1 mmol/L, (G) LAGE, and (H) MBG. † p < .05 by paired t test (two‐tailed), n = 14. (I–J) Changes of GV indices at T1W, 1 month (T1M), and 3 months (T3M) calculated using self‐monitoring of blood glucose data: (I) TIR and (J) hypoglycemic episodes. $ q < 0.05 as stated in (B); # q < 0.05 by repeated‐measures Friedman test corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method, n = 14. (K) Representative CGM 24‐h glucose profiles demonstrating improved glycemic stability in two patients <t>by</t> <t>WMT.</t> Values of some GV indices were the same for different participants. Thus, both points and connecting lines overlapped with each other, exhibiting fewer than 14 points. LAGE, largest amplitude of glycemic excursions; MAGE, mean amplitude of glycemic excursion; MBG, mean blood glucose; SDBG, SD of blood glucose; TIR, time in range; WMT, washed microbiota transplantation.
Kontinuierliche Glukosemesssysteme Cgm, supplied by Beratung GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/kontinuierliche glukosemesssysteme cgm/product/Beratung GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
kontinuierliche glukosemesssysteme cgm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
noninvasive, transdermal cgm system  (Echo Therapeutics)
90
Echo Therapeutics noninvasive, transdermal cgm system
(A) Flow diagram of study design and participating patients. (B) Changes of daily insulin dose. Data of the same subject at different follow‐up time points are connected by gray lines. False discovery rate (represented as q ‐value) was calculated using repeated‐measures one‐way analysis of variance corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method for multiple comparisons, n = 14. (C) Postprandial glucose excursions expressed as percentage of baseline during steamed bun meal test (SBMT). All data are represented as mean ± SEM, * q < 0.05 by mixed‐effects model for repeated measures corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method, n = 9–12. (D–H) Changes of glycemic variability (GV) indices at 1 week (T1W) calculated using continuous glucose monitor <t>(CGM)</t> data: (D) MAGE, (E) SDBG, (F) BG > 11.1 mmol/L, (G) LAGE, and (H) MBG. † p < .05 by paired t test (two‐tailed), n = 14. (I–J) Changes of GV indices at T1W, 1 month (T1M), and 3 months (T3M) calculated using self‐monitoring of blood glucose data: (I) TIR and (J) hypoglycemic episodes. $ q < 0.05 as stated in (B); # q < 0.05 by repeated‐measures Friedman test corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method, n = 14. (K) Representative CGM 24‐h glucose profiles demonstrating improved glycemic stability in two patients <t>by</t> <t>WMT.</t> Values of some GV indices were the same for different participants. Thus, both points and connecting lines overlapped with each other, exhibiting fewer than 14 points. LAGE, largest amplitude of glycemic excursions; MAGE, mean amplitude of glycemic excursion; MBG, mean blood glucose; SDBG, SD of blood glucose; TIR, time in range; WMT, washed microbiota transplantation.
Noninvasive, Transdermal Cgm System, supplied by Echo Therapeutics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/noninvasive, transdermal cgm system/product/Echo Therapeutics
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
noninvasive, transdermal cgm system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
symphony cgm  (Echo Therapeutics)
90
Echo Therapeutics symphony cgm
(A) Flow diagram of study design and participating patients. (B) Changes of daily insulin dose. Data of the same subject at different follow‐up time points are connected by gray lines. False discovery rate (represented as q ‐value) was calculated using repeated‐measures one‐way analysis of variance corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method for multiple comparisons, n = 14. (C) Postprandial glucose excursions expressed as percentage of baseline during steamed bun meal test (SBMT). All data are represented as mean ± SEM, * q < 0.05 by mixed‐effects model for repeated measures corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method, n = 9–12. (D–H) Changes of glycemic variability (GV) indices at 1 week (T1W) calculated using continuous glucose monitor <t>(CGM)</t> data: (D) MAGE, (E) SDBG, (F) BG > 11.1 mmol/L, (G) LAGE, and (H) MBG. † p < .05 by paired t test (two‐tailed), n = 14. (I–J) Changes of GV indices at T1W, 1 month (T1M), and 3 months (T3M) calculated using self‐monitoring of blood glucose data: (I) TIR and (J) hypoglycemic episodes. $ q < 0.05 as stated in (B); # q < 0.05 by repeated‐measures Friedman test corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method, n = 14. (K) Representative CGM 24‐h glucose profiles demonstrating improved glycemic stability in two patients <t>by</t> <t>WMT.</t> Values of some GV indices were the same for different participants. Thus, both points and connecting lines overlapped with each other, exhibiting fewer than 14 points. LAGE, largest amplitude of glycemic excursions; MAGE, mean amplitude of glycemic excursion; MBG, mean blood glucose; SDBG, SD of blood glucose; TIR, time in range; WMT, washed microbiota transplantation.
Symphony Cgm, supplied by Echo Therapeutics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/symphony cgm/product/Echo Therapeutics
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
symphony cgm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cgm system  (Echo Therapeutics)
90
Echo Therapeutics cgm system
(A) Flow diagram of study design and participating patients. (B) Changes of daily insulin dose. Data of the same subject at different follow‐up time points are connected by gray lines. False discovery rate (represented as q ‐value) was calculated using repeated‐measures one‐way analysis of variance corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method for multiple comparisons, n = 14. (C) Postprandial glucose excursions expressed as percentage of baseline during steamed bun meal test (SBMT). All data are represented as mean ± SEM, * q < 0.05 by mixed‐effects model for repeated measures corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method, n = 9–12. (D–H) Changes of glycemic variability (GV) indices at 1 week (T1W) calculated using continuous glucose monitor <t>(CGM)</t> data: (D) MAGE, (E) SDBG, (F) BG > 11.1 mmol/L, (G) LAGE, and (H) MBG. † p < .05 by paired t test (two‐tailed), n = 14. (I–J) Changes of GV indices at T1W, 1 month (T1M), and 3 months (T3M) calculated using self‐monitoring of blood glucose data: (I) TIR and (J) hypoglycemic episodes. $ q < 0.05 as stated in (B); # q < 0.05 by repeated‐measures Friedman test corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method, n = 14. (K) Representative CGM 24‐h glucose profiles demonstrating improved glycemic stability in two patients <t>by</t> <t>WMT.</t> Values of some GV indices were the same for different participants. Thus, both points and connecting lines overlapped with each other, exhibiting fewer than 14 points. LAGE, largest amplitude of glycemic excursions; MAGE, mean amplitude of glycemic excursion; MBG, mean blood glucose; SDBG, SD of blood glucose; TIR, time in range; WMT, washed microbiota transplantation.
Cgm System, supplied by Echo Therapeutics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cgm system/product/Echo Therapeutics
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cgm system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
g6 cgm sensor  (Tandem Diabetes)
90
Tandem Diabetes g6 cgm sensor
(A) Flow diagram of study design and participating patients. (B) Changes of daily insulin dose. Data of the same subject at different follow‐up time points are connected by gray lines. False discovery rate (represented as q ‐value) was calculated using repeated‐measures one‐way analysis of variance corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method for multiple comparisons, n = 14. (C) Postprandial glucose excursions expressed as percentage of baseline during steamed bun meal test (SBMT). All data are represented as mean ± SEM, * q < 0.05 by mixed‐effects model for repeated measures corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method, n = 9–12. (D–H) Changes of glycemic variability (GV) indices at 1 week (T1W) calculated using continuous glucose monitor <t>(CGM)</t> data: (D) MAGE, (E) SDBG, (F) BG > 11.1 mmol/L, (G) LAGE, and (H) MBG. † p < .05 by paired t test (two‐tailed), n = 14. (I–J) Changes of GV indices at T1W, 1 month (T1M), and 3 months (T3M) calculated using self‐monitoring of blood glucose data: (I) TIR and (J) hypoglycemic episodes. $ q < 0.05 as stated in (B); # q < 0.05 by repeated‐measures Friedman test corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method, n = 14. (K) Representative CGM 24‐h glucose profiles demonstrating improved glycemic stability in two patients <t>by</t> <t>WMT.</t> Values of some GV indices were the same for different participants. Thus, both points and connecting lines overlapped with each other, exhibiting fewer than 14 points. LAGE, largest amplitude of glycemic excursions; MAGE, mean amplitude of glycemic excursion; MBG, mean blood glucose; SDBG, SD of blood glucose; TIR, time in range; WMT, washed microbiota transplantation.
G6 Cgm Sensor, supplied by Tandem Diabetes, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/g6 cgm sensor/product/Tandem Diabetes
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
g6 cgm sensor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cgm-system  (Anwendung GmbH)
90
Anwendung GmbH cgm-system
(A) Flow diagram of study design and participating patients. (B) Changes of daily insulin dose. Data of the same subject at different follow‐up time points are connected by gray lines. False discovery rate (represented as q ‐value) was calculated using repeated‐measures one‐way analysis of variance corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method for multiple comparisons, n = 14. (C) Postprandial glucose excursions expressed as percentage of baseline during steamed bun meal test (SBMT). All data are represented as mean ± SEM, * q < 0.05 by mixed‐effects model for repeated measures corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method, n = 9–12. (D–H) Changes of glycemic variability (GV) indices at 1 week (T1W) calculated using continuous glucose monitor <t>(CGM)</t> data: (D) MAGE, (E) SDBG, (F) BG > 11.1 mmol/L, (G) LAGE, and (H) MBG. † p < .05 by paired t test (two‐tailed), n = 14. (I–J) Changes of GV indices at T1W, 1 month (T1M), and 3 months (T3M) calculated using self‐monitoring of blood glucose data: (I) TIR and (J) hypoglycemic episodes. $ q < 0.05 as stated in (B); # q < 0.05 by repeated‐measures Friedman test corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method, n = 14. (K) Representative CGM 24‐h glucose profiles demonstrating improved glycemic stability in two patients <t>by</t> <t>WMT.</t> Values of some GV indices were the same for different participants. Thus, both points and connecting lines overlapped with each other, exhibiting fewer than 14 points. LAGE, largest amplitude of glycemic excursions; MAGE, mean amplitude of glycemic excursion; MBG, mean blood glucose; SDBG, SD of blood glucose; TIR, time in range; WMT, washed microbiota transplantation.
Cgm System, supplied by Anwendung GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cgm-system/product/Anwendung GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cgm-system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) Flow diagram of study design and participating patients. (B) Changes of daily insulin dose. Data of the same subject at different follow‐up time points are connected by gray lines. False discovery rate (represented as q ‐value) was calculated using repeated‐measures one‐way analysis of variance corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method for multiple comparisons, n = 14. (C) Postprandial glucose excursions expressed as percentage of baseline during steamed bun meal test (SBMT). All data are represented as mean ± SEM, * q < 0.05 by mixed‐effects model for repeated measures corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method, n = 9–12. (D–H) Changes of glycemic variability (GV) indices at 1 week (T1W) calculated using continuous glucose monitor (CGM) data: (D) MAGE, (E) SDBG, (F) BG > 11.1 mmol/L, (G) LAGE, and (H) MBG. † p < .05 by paired t test (two‐tailed), n = 14. (I–J) Changes of GV indices at T1W, 1 month (T1M), and 3 months (T3M) calculated using self‐monitoring of blood glucose data: (I) TIR and (J) hypoglycemic episodes. $ q < 0.05 as stated in (B); # q < 0.05 by repeated‐measures Friedman test corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method, n = 14. (K) Representative CGM 24‐h glucose profiles demonstrating improved glycemic stability in two patients by WMT. Values of some GV indices were the same for different participants. Thus, both points and connecting lines overlapped with each other, exhibiting fewer than 14 points. LAGE, largest amplitude of glycemic excursions; MAGE, mean amplitude of glycemic excursion; MBG, mean blood glucose; SDBG, SD of blood glucose; TIR, time in range; WMT, washed microbiota transplantation.

Journal: Journal of Diabetes

Article Title: Washed microbiota transplantation reduces glycemic variability in unstable diabetes

doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13485

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Flow diagram of study design and participating patients. (B) Changes of daily insulin dose. Data of the same subject at different follow‐up time points are connected by gray lines. False discovery rate (represented as q ‐value) was calculated using repeated‐measures one‐way analysis of variance corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method for multiple comparisons, n = 14. (C) Postprandial glucose excursions expressed as percentage of baseline during steamed bun meal test (SBMT). All data are represented as mean ± SEM, * q < 0.05 by mixed‐effects model for repeated measures corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method, n = 9–12. (D–H) Changes of glycemic variability (GV) indices at 1 week (T1W) calculated using continuous glucose monitor (CGM) data: (D) MAGE, (E) SDBG, (F) BG > 11.1 mmol/L, (G) LAGE, and (H) MBG. † p < .05 by paired t test (two‐tailed), n = 14. (I–J) Changes of GV indices at T1W, 1 month (T1M), and 3 months (T3M) calculated using self‐monitoring of blood glucose data: (I) TIR and (J) hypoglycemic episodes. $ q < 0.05 as stated in (B); # q < 0.05 by repeated‐measures Friedman test corrected by Benjamini and Hochberg method, n = 14. (K) Representative CGM 24‐h glucose profiles demonstrating improved glycemic stability in two patients by WMT. Values of some GV indices were the same for different participants. Thus, both points and connecting lines overlapped with each other, exhibiting fewer than 14 points. LAGE, largest amplitude of glycemic excursions; MAGE, mean amplitude of glycemic excursion; MBG, mean blood glucose; SDBG, SD of blood glucose; TIR, time in range; WMT, washed microbiota transplantation.

Article Snippet: Three days before WMT, patients were implanted with a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) device (MeiQi Medical Instruments Co., Ltd., Huzhou, China).

Techniques: Two Tailed Test, Transplantation Assay

Washed microbiota transplantation (WMT) alters profiles of serum metabolites. (A) Heatmap showing changes of serum metabolites determined by non‐targeted metabolomics, n = 11–14. (B) Heatmap of Spearman's correlation coefficients between serum metabolites and glycemic variability (GV) indices. (C) The 8 positively correlated metabolites between fecal and serum compartments. Color range varies from light red (weaker correlation) to dark red (stronger correlation). Statistical methods were the same as stated in Figure . AUC, area under the curve; BG, blood glucose; CGM, continuous glucose monitor; CV, coefficient of variation; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; LAGE, largest amplitude of glycemic excursions; MBG, mean blood glucose; PPGE, postprandial glucose excursion; SBMT, steamed bun meal test; SMBG, self‐monitoring of blood glucose; TIR, time in range.

Journal: Journal of Diabetes

Article Title: Washed microbiota transplantation reduces glycemic variability in unstable diabetes

doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13485

Figure Lengend Snippet: Washed microbiota transplantation (WMT) alters profiles of serum metabolites. (A) Heatmap showing changes of serum metabolites determined by non‐targeted metabolomics, n = 11–14. (B) Heatmap of Spearman's correlation coefficients between serum metabolites and glycemic variability (GV) indices. (C) The 8 positively correlated metabolites between fecal and serum compartments. Color range varies from light red (weaker correlation) to dark red (stronger correlation). Statistical methods were the same as stated in Figure . AUC, area under the curve; BG, blood glucose; CGM, continuous glucose monitor; CV, coefficient of variation; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; LAGE, largest amplitude of glycemic excursions; MBG, mean blood glucose; PPGE, postprandial glucose excursion; SBMT, steamed bun meal test; SMBG, self‐monitoring of blood glucose; TIR, time in range.

Article Snippet: Three days before WMT, patients were implanted with a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) device (MeiQi Medical Instruments Co., Ltd., Huzhou, China).

Techniques: Transplantation Assay